
Defense lawyer David Rudolf argues that the amount of blood
could have been caused by an accidental fall. |
The prosecution called witness after witness to the stand,
insisting on three points: the quantity of blood found beside
the body, the wounds on Kathleen's head, and the iron
poker as the murder weapon. But the witnesses faltered during
David Rudolf's clever cross-examination.
In an obstinate
contest of eloquence, Michael Peterson's lawyer unveiled
the incompetence and partiality of the witnesses.
David Rudolf insisted that the crime scene wasn't properly
documented or maintained. Police photos taken on the same
day revealed small differences in the bloodstains on the
staircase and he suggested that someone may have attempted
to clean the scene.
"Well, if it was cleaned up, it
was cleaned up by police and not by Michael Peterson. That's
the kind of thing that creates questions in the minds of
the jurors. I mean, would you want to bet your own life
on the competency of Dan George and the Durham Crime Scene
Investigators? Because if you wouldn't want to bet your
own life on them, then don't bet Michael Peterson's life."
He challenged Dr. Deborah Radisch's autopsy report which
stated that Kathleen Peterson died because of a beating
despite the absence of any skull fractures or brain injuries.
He asked why, in the 250 recorded beating deaths in North
Carolina in the past decade, was there not one single incident
involving multiple blows to the head which did not include
these injuries.
And Michael
Peterson shut himself up at home, surrounded by his children
and brother, to escape the fury launched upon him by the
media. His son Clayton expressed his concern for his father's
future. Peterson replied,
"The more you worry about me, the more
worried I get. Let me worry about you."
Yet he knows the worst is yet to come: the public exposure
of his most intimate secrets.
|