CBC Global Header Navigation

 
CBCradio
Bookmark and Share

Is the Truth and Reconciliation Commission the best way to move forward from the legacy of the Indian residential schools?

Interviewed by guest host Reg Sherren on the June 20, 2010 program

"Is the Truth and Reconciliation Commission the best way to move forward from the legacy of the Indian residential schools?"

Download Flash Player to view this content.

  • Justice Murray Sinclair
    Chair of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
  • Carolyn Buffalo
    Chief of the Montana Cree First Nation near Hobbema, Alberta
  • Erna Paris
    Award winning author and historian, Erna Paris. Her books include The End of Days: A Story of Tolerance, Tyranny and the Expulsion of the Jews from Spain, and Long Shadows: Truth, Lies and History. Her most recent book is The Sun Climbs Slow: The International Criminal court and the struggle for Justice.
  • Jim Miller
    Canada Research Chair and Professor of History, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.

Guest host David Gray's introduction to the June 27, 2010 program:

Our question today: "Are you satisfied with Canada's hosting of the G8, G20 summits ...and the results?"

What should we make of the images and sounds coming from Toronto and broadcast across the country? The tidy rows of flags, the smiles of world leaders, and of course the contrast of burning police cars and vandals in black, smashing windows.

On a quiet summer afternoon here in Calgary it all seems a long way away and difficult to fathom.

Today we want to talk about the G8 and G20 summits that have taken place over the past few days. The meetings matter because anything that involves so many leaders of so many countries getting together in one place is significant. Even some of the strongest critics of the events -- the protestors on the streets -- agree, although in a different way. They spend a lot of energy trying to put their own stamp on these summits.

It's important to note that the vandalism and violence in the streets come from a very small group that has been planning to create havoc. They are greatly outnumbered by protestors who maintain peace and march with dignity.

When the temporary cells are emptied, the security fences come down, and the last news conference is held, the real measure of success will be in what comes out of those sequestered meetings. Not the promises made, but the progress delivered.

What is your reaction to all this? Do the protests ..and the vandalism ..and the now huge cost of security argue against these kind of events? Or do the benefits of so many world leaders getting together face to face outweigh the disadvantages?

The G8 leaders pledged to spend $5-billion dollars over five years on maternal and child health ...that's not small change ...and Canada alone has proimised $1.1-billion of that.

The G20 leaders are trying to find common ground in strategies to stabilize the world economy in the aftermath of the worst global recession since the 1930's.

They're all worthy goals but we want to know if you think the whole G processes are paying dividends. What about Canada's role in hosting these two events back to back? Did Canada do a good job? Did the protests detract from the events ...or are they now simply part of the landscape of international summits?

I'm David Gray ...on CBC Radio One ...and on Sirius satellite radio channel 137 ...this is Cross Country Checkup.

Links



  • Truth and Reconciliation: An interview with John Milloy
    • Commenting has been disabled for this entry.