Judge overturns $417M award against Johnson & Johnson in ovarian cancer case
Plaintiff claimed she developed terminal ovarian cancer after using talcum powder
A judge on Friday tossed out a $417-million US jury award to a woman who claimed she developed ovarian cancer by using Johnson & Johnson talc-based baby powder for feminine hygiene.
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Maren Nelson granted the company's request for a new trial, saying there were errors and jury misconduct in the previous trial that ended with the award two months ago.
Nelson also ruled that there wasn't convincing evidence that Johnson & Johnson acted with malice and the award for damages was excessive.
The decision will be appealed even though Eva Echeverria has died, said her lawyer, Mark Robinson Jr.
"We will continue to fight on behalf of all women who have been impacted by this dangerous product," he said in a statement.
Echeverria alleged Johnson & Johnson failed to adequately warn consumers about talcum powder's potential cancer risks. She used the company's baby powder on a daily basis beginning in the 1950s until 2016 and was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2007, according to court papers.
Echeverria developed ovarian cancer as a "proximate result of the unreasonably dangerous and defective nature of talcum powder," she said in her lawsuit.
Her lawyer contended that documents showed that Johnson & Johnson knew about the risks of talc and ovarian cancer for three decades.
The company said it was pleased with the ruling.
"Ovarian cancer is a devastating disease — but it is not caused by the cosmetic-grade talc we have used in Johnson's Baby Powder for decades. The science is clear and we will continue to defend the safety of Johnson's Baby Powder as we prepare for additional trials in the U.S.," spokesperson Carol Goodrich said in a statement.
- Court ruling may hurt claims of talc link to cancer
- Baby powder jury awards woman record-setting $110.5M
- J&J ordered to pay $55M in cancer-talcum powder case
Similar allegations have led to hundreds of lawsuits against the New Jersey-based company. Jury awards have totalled hundreds of millions of dollars.
However, on Tuesday a Missouri appellate court threw out a $72-million award to the family of an Alabama woman who has died, ruling that the state wasn't the proper jurisdiction for such a case.
The court cited a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June that placed limits on where injury lawsuits could be filed, saying state courts cannot hear claims against companies not based in the state where alleged injuries occurred.
Popular in News
1 3007 reading now TD Canada Trust backs down, releases family's $846K inheritance
- 2 2624 reading now North Bay grandparents being sued for child support
- 3 1514 reading now Clarenville grieving after suicide of young music teacher, mental health advocate
- 4 753 reading now 'Shocked': Retiring chief justice was blindsided by Stephen Harper's public attack
- 5 733 reading now CRA service issues are systemic, says taxpayers' ombudsman