Toronto

Try Dora, not Pooh: Storybooks with human characters instead of animals better for learning, study finds

U of T researchers found realistic stories better for promoting pro-social behavior

Winnie-the-Pooh

Storybooks featuring human characters instead of cuddly critters — think Dora the Explorer, not Winnie the Pooh — are the best bet for teaching kids life lessons, a new study from the University of Toronto finds. (Mark Burgess/Four Colman Getty)

 shares

 

Storybooks featuring human characters instead of cuddly critters — think Dora the Explorer, not Winnie the Pooh — are the best bet for teaching kids life lessons, a new study from the University of Toronto finds.

The research from U of T's Ontario Institute for Studies in Education tested the longstanding belief that stories with animal-based characters like Franklin the turtle or Arthur the aardvark help children learn as effectively, if not better than, stories with human characters.

Instead, the researchers found realistic stories are better for promoting young children's pro-social behavior — things like sharing with their peers, for instance.

"Children are more likely to learn from books that have characters they can identify with more easily," explains lead researcher Patricia Ganea in an interview with CBC's Metro Morning.

"So, a human character, instead of an animal dressed up like a human."

Dora the Explorer trumps Franklin the Turtle, new research says 7:18

For the research, Ganea and her team read preschoolers a sharing story with either human characters or anthropomorphized animal characters.

Children were also given stickers and had a chance to share some of their 10 stickers with another child, according to U of T's coverage of Ganea's research, and the number of stickers shared provided a measure of children's altruistic giving.

"Reading the human story significantly increased preschoolers' altruistic giving but reading the anthropomorphic story or a control story decreased it," the study finds.

Patricia Ganea

"Children are more likely to learn from books that have characters they can identify with more easily," explains lead researcher Patricia Ganea. (University of Toronto)

'Expand' types of books kids read, researcher says

But that doesn't mean parents should ditch animal books, the researchers say.

"The message is not that we should not read fantasy books to our children — those are wonderful books, and great literature that children should certainly be exposed to," says Ganea, an associate professor of early cognitive development at OISE

"The message from this study, though, is we should expand childrens' books."

That should also mean finding books that represent different genders and ethnicities so kids are "portrayed in the books that they're reading," she adds.

"It will be much easier for them to relate to a girl or boy in a book than a raccoon who is talking," Ganea says.

The study is from the August issue of Developmental Science.

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Submission Policy

Note: The CBC does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that comments are moderated and published according to our submission guidelines.