Oilpatch wins the day in royalty review

Is it time for the oilpatch to stop fearing the NDP?

Rachel Notley

Alberta Premier Rachel Notley unveiled her government's royalty review findings on Friday. The report was well received by industry. (CBC)



Originally published Jan. 29.

The collective sigh of relief in downtown Calgary was probably audible last week, as Alberta's royalty review panel decided against asking the energy sector to pay more.

There was no change to oilsands royalties and no increase in rates for conventional oil, natural gas or natural gas liquids. The only way the provincial government will see more revenue from the industry is if production grows and drillers become more efficient.

'I think it's sobering for people who might have the impression of an industry that is always raking in lots of money.' - Gary Leach, Explorers and Producers Canada

After the fear and uncertainty that was unleashed 10 months ago after the NDP election in Alberta, it was the best possible outcome for the energy sector.

So what happened?

Why aren't royalties going up?

During the provincial election campaign, then-NDP leader Rachel Notley said that under Progressive Conservative governments, Alberta charged one of the world's lowest royalty rates for its energy. That was the popular sentiment based on an almost impossibly complex royalty regime and a general sense that for many years, the oilpatch sure made a whole bunch of money.

When the royalty review began in late August, though, the panel ordered a lot of research.  

Dave Mowat

Dave Mowat, head of the review panel, says new royalty rates must be fair both when oil is $30 US a barrel and when it is at $100. (CBC)

The vast majority of the $3-million budget for the royalty review panel was spent on data, including a comprehensive report comparing royalty rates in different parts of the country and the world. As it turned out, that report showed Alberta in the middle of the pack, better royalties than some locations, worse than others.

Not the worst in the world — not even close.

'"I think it's sobering for people who might have the impression of an industry that is always raking in lots of money," said Gary Leach, executive director of Explorers and Producers Canada, which represents junior energy companies.

Oilpatch in existential crisis

Leach said he is glad the report was done during an economic downturn.

"Doing this review against this backdrop is very sobering for governments," Leach said. "In fact, the panel report shows that this industry actually has a very low rate of return on capital invested."

According to one member of the royalty panel, Alberta's energy sector is in an existential crisis — prices are low, the province has no tidewater access, costs are high and the U.S. is producing its own oil and gas and starting to export. The world does not need to come to Canada to get oil anymore.

That existential crisis was heightened by the election of a government that was thought to be antagonistic to the industry.

But that perceived antagonism seemed to have been trumped by data. Most energy companies came out of the royalty consultations feeling good.

"I think there was a lot of alarm at the outset of this process," Leach said. "As the government has immersed itself in this subject and as the realities of governing the province have illuminated the subject, I think we became more confident."

Alberta royalties by product

Alberta royalties by product until 2015 (Alberta royalty review report)

Encouraging drillers to become efficient

What did change in the review is the manner in which conventional oil and gas drillers calculate their royalties  Currently there is a hodgepodge system that resulted in every well in the province paying a different royalty rate.

While that system will continue for existing wells for a decade, for new wells that begin drilling in 2017, it will be much more straightforward. They will pay a five per cent royalty rate until they have paid off the capital costs of drilling the well. Once that happens, a higher royalty rate will kick in.

What's key here is that the government will determine what the capital costs of drilling the well should be, based on an industry average. That means that companies that can drill wells cheaper than average get to pay a lower royalty rate for longer, while those who are less efficient will start to pay higher royalties before earning back the cost of drilling the well.

Playing the long game

Oil industry on Alberta royalties 4:46

All this is intended to grow the industry by making it more efficient and more attractive to investment. But it's not a quick turnaround. Premier Notley suggested that after two years, there would be more royalties flowing to government that will be invested in the Heritage Savings Trust Fund. Even that might be an optimistic timeline.

"These kinds of evolutionary changes in a system take time," Trevor Tombe, an economist with the University of Calgary, said.

"It will require firms to innovate, to think through new processes. But that's good, royalties are not here for short-term gains; they're here to ensure you have a stable predictable efficient system in the long run."

Alberta not thinking like an owner

While this means the energy industry can probably stop fearing the NDP, not everyone agrees with the approach.

Jim Roy is the president of Delta Royalty Consulting and a former royalty advisor for Alberta Energy. He had hoped that the province would roll back some of the royalty reductions that were enacted in the last change in 2009 and was disappointed that not only were the old rules continued for existing wells, but that incentives continue to be offered for new wells.

Roy also questioned why Alberta would be encouraging more oilsands development in a time of depressed prices.

"The plan appears to be to increase Alberta production at the maximum possible rate despite low prices," said Roy in an interview.

"This strategy may help American consumers, but does not help Alberta owners."

More On This Story

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

Submission Policy

Note: The CBC does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that comments are moderated and published according to our submission guidelines.