CBC Digital Archives

Lesson Plan: For Teachers: Evaluating websites in the Abortion Debate

Type:
Webquest
Subjects:
Media Studies
Duration:
3 lessons
Purpose:
To view online information critically
Summary:
Using a variety of web-based resources, students will investigate and analyze Web sites that are supported by proponents on both sides of the abortion debate.

Lesson Plan

Introduction

There are few issues as divisive as abortion. Whatever side you are on, chances are your feelings are strong. Some people are willing to risk jail and even death to defend their views. Because abortion is a political issue as well as a personal one, proponents on both sides would like to convince society that their view is not only the right view, but the only view. With the advent of new technology, they are taking their arguments to the Internet.

The Task

Students will prepare a presentation analyzing how proponents on each side of the abortion debate use the internet to spread their message. Students will visit both pro-abortion and anti-abortion sites. In their research, students will view the sites critically and focus on understanding what each site is trying to convey. Their research may uncover "fringe" or controversial sites, and the students should view these as well to understand how the internet can be used to educate and convince or to inflame and deceive.


Students will create a presentation focusing on two sites from each side of the debate. Their presentation should analyze the techniques that the sponsors of the site use to bring people to their side of the abortion issue. Students should display the pages from the sites and should highlight specific elements that are particularly effective, intriguing, or inflammatory.

The Process

Students will work in groups. They should begin their research on the topic Dr. Henry Morgentaler: Fighting Canada's Abortion Laws on the CBC Digital Archives website. On the site, students will find some pro-abortion and anti-abortion sites. They can begin with these sites as well as using search engines. All the research should be performed online and students should note all sites consulted and cited.

Conclusion

Over the course of several days, have each group deliver its presentation to the class. Students should explain why they chose their four sites. After each presentation, ask: Were the sites effective or ineffective in conveying their views and convincing the public. Why? After all the presentations, lead a class discussion on which sites were the most effective, the most educational, the most inflammatory, and why.

Materials

Projection unit that can display web pages

Download PDF


Related Content

Fighting Words: Bill 101

On March 31, 2005, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld Quebec's language law but ruled that the...

Dr. Henry Morgentaler: Fighting Canada's Abor...

In 1969 Dr. Henry Morgentaler emerged as one of Canada's most controversial figures when he br...

Trudeau's Omnibus Bill: Challenging Canadian ...

"There's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation." Those unforgettable words made...

2011 leaders' debate

Four leaders - Gilles Duceppe, Stephen Harper, Michael Ignatieff and Jack Layton - discuss the...

2011 leaders' debate (highlights)

CBC-TV reporter Terry Milewski summarizes the four-way 2011 federal election debate.

2008 leaders' debate

A round-table format and questions from Canadians give a new feel to the leaders' debate in 20...