Accessibility Links
English vs. French?
Do you want "a new agreement with the rest of Canada, based on the equality of nations"? That was the heart of the question placed before the people of Quebec in the May 20, 1980 referendum. René Lévesque's Parti Québécois was asking Quebecers for a mandate to negotiate "sovereignty-association", an idea that inflamed federalists and separatists alike. CBC Archives looks back at the vote that divided a province and changed a nation.
• Leaders of both sides anticipated an almost unanimous No vote among anglophones, and adjusted their calculations accordingly. The Parti Québécois figured it needed 63 per cent of francophones to vote Yes to achieve a majority. Federalists hoped for a 60 per cent No vote from the general population. That would mean that a majority of francophones had rejected sovereignty-association.
• Kevin Drummond, who appears in this clip, was a high-profile English-speaking Liberal cabinet minister who switched sides to support sovereignty association. His decision shocked friends and relatives, and the mayor of Westmount called him a traitor. Drummond said he was simply a Quebec patriot who recognized that the Parti Québécois had a better proposal. "It's very seldom you get the chance to vote to eliminate one level of government," Drummond said. "It's a pain in the neck paying taxes to two governments."
• Referendum results were not tracked by the language of the voter, so there is no way of knowing how the vote broke down.
• There are a million French-speaking Canadians outside Quebec.
• René Lévesque's Parti Québécois set off a controversy in 1977 when it introduced Bill 101, a law that restricted the use of English and made French the dominant language in the province. Some hailed the move as a master plan to free Quebec from the economic dominance of the province's English minority. But it also made Anglo-Quebecers feel unwelcome and uncomfortable, and led to an exodus of anglophones from Quebec. For more on the language law, see our topic Fighting Words: Bill 101.
• The Richard riot mentioned at the beginning of this clip took place following a Montreal Canadiens home game on March 17, 1955. When legendary Quebec hockey star Maurice (Rocket) Richard hit a linesman, he was suspended by NHL President Clarence Campbell (often seen as a symbol of the disdained anglophone ruling elite.) The crowd was furious, and a riot spilled out onto the streets of Montreal. The event was a lightning rod for French-English tensions.
• This Sunday Morning item was broadcast shortly after the end of the debate over the wording of the referendum. That landmark event took place in the National Assembly and lasted 35 hours. The debate was carried in its entirety on the provincial government television channel, with edited versions aired in prime time by CBC and private networks. Some 600,000 people watched the televised debate nightly.
• Consensus opinion was that the Parti Québécois handily won the debate. The Liberals, who until a day earlier focused on preparing their beige paper, appeared disorganized and pedantic. They picked apart the question and branded the PQ as separatist.
• For the most part, the PQ didn't focus on the question, but presented an impassioned defence of its vision. They were much better organized, and arranged a lineup of many more speakers than the Liberals could present, controlling the airtime by a two-to-one margin. Levesque
Program: Sunday Morning
Broadcast Date: March 23, 1980
Guest(s): Kevin Drummond, Marc Laurendeau, Claude Morin
Reporter: Terence McKenna
Duration: 8:37
Last updated: April 10, 2013
Page consulted on April 10, 2013
All Clips from this Topic
-
Lévesque tells American businessmen and Canadian TV viewers that the t...
-
In 1948, a referendum gave Canada a new province. Could it take one aw...
-
The opposing leaders of the referendum fight come from similar backgro...
-
Claude Morin, Quebec minister of intergovernmental affairs, explains h...
-
A provincial white paper explains "sovereignty-association" and urges ...
-
The architects of sovereignty draw on toothpaste marketing and Reader'...
-
Callers from across the country debate the Quebec referendum question.
-
Anglo-Quebecers overwhelmingly oppose sovereignty, and there are fears...
-
Some compare separatist anglophones to "chickens for Col. Saunders"
-
Pipe bombs destroy billboards, and there are allegations of improper s...
-
The "Yvettes" stage a massive rally for the No side.
-
The date is set, and political foes send out dire messages about what ...
-
Most of English Quebec is voting No as a block. The rest are sometimes...
-
Yes and No sides spend $800,000 each to woo the undecided.
-
Strategists will use anything to capture hearts and minds of Quebec vo...
-
At an enormous rally before the referendum vote, the prime minister vo...
-
Ann Medina says Americans are either uninterested or biting their tong...
-
A panel of experts discusses the economics of sovereignty-association.
-
Partisan pugilists ply political punches.
-
The Quebec Liberal leader triumphs for the "No" campaign in the 1980 Q...
