Canada's marijuana laws declared unconstitutional
In 1923 it became illegal for Canadians to possess marijuana. But the laws have always been flouted, by recreational users who just want to get high, and by medicinal users seeking relief from pain and illness. From cannabis cafés to courtrooms, doctors and patients, rabble-rousers and senior statesmen have engaged in a passionate debate over marijuana possession. But the laws have endured.
. Parker began smoking marijuana after his second surgery, and his doctor noticed that the seizures halted. He was arrested for possession in 1987, but acquitted due to "medical necessity."
. On July 18, 1996, Parker was arrested for possession, cultivation and trafficking, and he appealed to the charter rights to "life, liberty and security." In 1997 a judge agreed that Parker's charter rights were violated, and ordered the police to return the plants they had seized.
. On July 31, 2000, the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that the law prohibiting marijuana possession was unconstitutional because it did not take users of medicinal marijuana into account. Justice Marc Rosenberg wrote, "I have concluded that the trial judge was right in finding that Parker needs marihuana to control the symptoms of his epilepsy. I have also concluded that the prohibition on the cultivation and possession of marihuana is unconstitutional."
. "I would declare the prohibition on the possession of marihuana in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to be of no force and effect," Justice Rosenberg continued. "However, since this would leave a gap in the regulatory scheme until Parliament could amend the legislation to comply with the Charter, I would suspend the declaration of invalidity for a year. During this period, the marihuana law remains in full force and effect."
. The ruling was essentially a challenge to the federal government to change marijuana laws within one year to take medical users into account, or risk having courts throw out charges against anyone found in possession of marijuana.
. The 1996 trafficking charges against Parker were upheld. Parker had admitted to distributing some of the marijuana to other patients.
. After the Parker ruling, the federal government created a new Medical Marijuana Access program, and hundreds of patients were granted exemptions. But the laws were not changed, and a legal source of marijuana was not provided. As a result, starting in 2003 several courts began throwing out possession charges based on the Parker decision.
Program: The National
Broadcast Date: July 31, 2000
Guests: Dann Michols, Terry Parker, Alan Young
Host: Peter Mansbridge
Reporter: Eric Sorensen
Last updated: July 29, 2013
Page consulted on December 6, 2013
All Clips from this Topic
"God made grass. Man made booze. Who do you trust?"
Ontario's highest court says Terry Parker can smoke up, and gives the ...
Today Canadians can apply for the right to possess and grow marijuana....
Laws could be relaxed for possessing small amounts of marijuana.
Criminal defence lawyer Paul Burstein and Canadian Police Association'...
The Special Committee on Illegal Drugs says pot smoking should be lega...
Another call for the softening of marijuana laws emphasizes drug's dan...
Confusion reigns as courts refuse to apply the law.
In 1923 it became illegal for Canadians to possess marijuana. But the ...