Cancer Research: The politics of getting grants
It's a dreaded disease that has afflicted humans for centuries. In recent decades, scientists around the world have been tirelessly searching for a cancer cure. Canadians are no exception. Amid constant fights for funding, concerns about "brain drain" and controversies over alternative therapies, Canada has made some vital breakthroughs in cancer research — from the invention of the "cobalt bomb" in the 1950s to the more recent innovations of cancer research icon Tak Mak.
The grant process can get extremely competitive. This often leads to researchers "playing up" the significance of their findings, according to science journalist Daniel Greenburg. This cutthroat environment could potentially lead to "outright dishonesty," he says.
. According to the NCIC website, grant applications are judged based on the following categories:
- scientific merit
- cancer relevance
- potential impact of the project
- credentials and track record of the applicant
. Other organizations that fund cancer research in Canada include the Montreal-based Cancer Research Society Inc., the Prostate Cancer Foundation of Canada and the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance.
. Since the 1970s, critics have complained about the political nature of cancer research funding. Many of the same types of criticisms heard in this clip are still being made today.
. In the 1995 book Cancer Wars: How Politics Shaped What We Know and Don't Know About Cancer, writer Robert N. Proctor commented on how cancer prevention (which he saw as extremely important) tends to get ignored in the funding game. "The sad truth is that cancer prevention is low prestige. Prevention is impoverished in an age of heroic medicine, where the reward structure is heavily biased in favour of .high-tech interventions and high-profile, Nobel Prize-potential basic science."
. The politics surrounding breast cancer research and its fundraising have also been much debated. In a 2003 CBC report, Barbara Brenner, executive director of Breast Cancer Action (a grassroots breast cancer education and advocacy group), said the messages of Breast Cancer Awareness Month are too "simplified and so fail to convey the realities of breast cancer." She also charged that many corporations that claim to support breast cancer awareness are actually producing products that contribute to the disease. (See the additional clip "Pink-washing.")
Broadcast Date: April 30, 1975
Guest(s): Marvin Blackstein, Daniel Greenburg, Tak Mak, Peter Scolefield, Robert Yaes
Producer: Max Allen
Last updated: September 18, 2013
Page consulted on December 5, 2013
All Clips from this Topic
CBC peers into the inner workings of the Canadian-designed cobalt beam...
CBC Newsmagazine offers an illustrated, easy-to-understand explanation...
Norman Depoe reports on a group of cancer researchers looking into vir...
Important cancer research is being conducted across Canada. But unless...
Canadian researchers must fight for funds in the highly competitive gr...
Former Saskatchewan premier Tommy Douglas recalls the province's innov...
A Canadian scientist's discovery promises to have a major impact on ca...
Tak Mak says no to a prestigious Yale position: the acclaimed cancer r...
Quebec's highly controversial Gaston Naessens is either a cancer savio...
A pharmaceutical company from France and the Canadian government team ...
An in-depth look at the politics and controversies involved in breast ...
Canada's star cancer researcher is going to head up a new breast cance...
It's a dreaded disease that has afflicted humans for centuries. In rec...